The media’s hokey conspiracy about Russia influencing our election is nothing less than a CIA coup attempt.
The media is fully cooperating with a CIA coup that projects its own treason on Donald Trump. Suddenly, all the prostitutes in the Establishment’s harem are very concerned about “foreign influence” on our election. Where were these cries of alarm when the Clinton Foundation was getting tens of millions of dollars from the Saudis and other Oil Kleptocracies in the Middle East?
In fact, the financing of the Clinton Foundation is highly relevant to what is going on now. The Saudi oil barons and others invested heavily in Hillary Clinton to get continued U.S. backing for “regime change” in Syria. Who had the Saudis been working with in Syria? The CIA!
Here’s a typical report, the lead paragraph of a story from this summer in the New York Times. Emphasis added:
Weapons shipped into Jordan by the Central Intelligence Agency and Saudi Arabia intended for Syrian rebels have been systematically stolen by Jordanian intelligence operatives and sold to arms merchants on the black market, according to American and Jordanian officials.
The CIA and the Saudis have been acting as partners in supplying terrorists (“rebels”) with weapons to overthrow Bashar al-Assad.
Do you think the Saudis would walk away from millions of dollars invested in Clinton?
Remember the CIA has already tried to alter this election. That’s where “former” CIA operative, Evan McMullen came from (https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/global-opinions/inside-evan-mcmullins-10-years-undercover-in-the-cia/2016/10/30/10347aa6-9d42-11e6-9980-50913d68eacb_story.html).
Here’s a recent tweet from McMullen:
Evan McMullin ✔ @Evan_McMullin
.@realDonaldTrump is attempting to obscure the truth that Russia did act to influence our presidential election. https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/808299841147248640 …
10:36 AM - 12 Dec 2016
2,530 2,530 Retweets 4,410 4,410 likes
No, the real security breach is that Saudi Arabia and the CIA are working to not only influence an election, but, having failed, to undermine and possibly overturn one. As Justin Raimondo writes at AntiWar.com,
The Saudis, having given millions (https://theintercept.com/2016/08/25/why-did-the-saudi-regime-and-other-gulf-tyrannies-donate-millions-to-the-clinton-foundation) to the Clinton Foundation, along with their Gulf state allies, were counting on a Clinton victory. The CIA has a longstanding relationship with Riyadh, and together they have been working assiduously to not only overthrow Assad in Syria but to forge a “moderate” Sunni alliance that will effectively police the region while establishing the Saudis as the regional hegemon. This was the Clintonian strategy while Hillary was at the helm of Foggy Bottom: Libya, Syria, the alliance with the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, are all examples of this utterly disastrous “Sunni turn.”
Trump represents a threat to this grand design, and therefore has to be stopped by whatever means necessary. His desire to “get along with Russia,” his opposition to regime change in Syria, his critique of the Libyan misadventure, his foreign policy stance in general – all this meant that he would come to power and “drain the swamp” of the CIA and the State Department.
And the mainstream media not only recites unsubstantiated claims from anonymous sources in the CIA, but is doing all it can to convince dupes that the CIA is “not political.”
In the meantime, the real enemy of the Establishment is the First Amendment. That is made very clear by Tucker Carlson in this interview:
Amazing. When the media got hold of Donald Trump’s 1995 tax return (http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/02/us/politics/donald-trump-taxes.html), which wasn’t legal to release, no one cared. The First Amendment means that no one can be punished or censored for publishing information once it has been released. Liberals are enraged that Wikileaks exposed the corruption of Hillary Clinton and the media to the voters.
The above video was posted by Mish in his excellent blog post, “Are CIA statements on Russia proof? Believable at all?” (https://mishtalk.com/2016/12/11/cia-statements-on-russia-believable-at-all)
He also posts this video from a time when Democrat politicians didn’t want the CIA to plant stories in the media.
CIA Admits Using News To Manipulate the USA (1950)
Until someone provides real proof of these allegations, we are entirely justified to see them as disinformation. We are watching a CIA coup attempt.